Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Lamb v. Astrue, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Robert Emerson Lamb against the Commissioner of Social Security. The district court had denied Lamb relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and dismissed it as frivolous and for failure to state a claim. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court denied Lamb's motion to expedite the case as moot.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-08-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-1349

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Robert Emerson Lamb against the Commissioner of Social Security. The district court had denied Lamb relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and dismissed it as frivolous and for failure to state a claim. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court denied Lamb's motion to expedite the case as moot.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    Lamb v. Astrue, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Robert Emerson Lamb against the Commissioner of Social Security. The district court had denied Lamb relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and dismissed it as frivolous and for failure to state a claim. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court denied Lamb's motion to expedite the case as moot.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-1349

    ROBERT EMERSON LAMB,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MICHAEL J.
    Security,

    ASTRUE,

    Commissioner

    of

    Social
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Newport News.
    Rebecca Beach Smith,
    District Judge. (04:07-cv-00019-RBS)

    Submitted:

    August 10, 2007

    Decided:

    August 20, 2007

    Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Robert Emerson Lamb, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Robert Emerson Lamb appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint and
    dismissing it as frivolous and for failure to state a claim under
    28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i),(ii). We have reviewed the record and
    find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

    stated by the district court.

    Lamb v. Astrue, No. 4:07-cv-00019-

    RBS (E.D. Va. April 10, 2007).

    We deny Lambs pro se motion to

    expedite as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts


    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like