Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Warren Russell v. Jon Ozmint, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Warren Russell filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. Russell appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its January 13, 2011 decision. The appeals court decided oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented to the court already.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-07-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-6148

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Warren Russell filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. Russell appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its January 13, 2011 decision. The appeals court decided oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented to the court already.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Warren Russell v. Jon Ozmint, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Warren Russell filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. Russell appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its January 13, 2011 decision. The appeals court decided oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented to the court already.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-6148

    WARREN RUSSELL,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    JON E. OZMINT; A. J. PADULA, Warden; MARGRET E. BELL,
    Associate Warden; J. J. BROOKS, Associate Warden; MS.
    WHITNEY,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Beaufort.
    J. Michelle Childs, District
    Judge. (9:10-cv-01246-JMC)

    Submitted:

    June 30, 2011

    Decided:

    July 6, 2011

    Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Warren Russell, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Arlene Thomas, THOMPSON


    & HENRY, PA, Conway, South Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Warren

    Russell

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.


    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    Russell v. Ozmint, No. 9:10-cv-01246-JMC (D.S.C. Jan.

    court.

    13, 2011).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like