Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    Ricky Minor v. United States, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ricky Gene Minor, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments as they would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Ricky Minor v. United States, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Ricky Gene Minor, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments as they would not aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-07-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-7634

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ricky Gene Minor, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments as they would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Ricky Minor v. United States, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ricky Gene Minor, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments as they would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-7634

    RICKY GENE MINOR,


    Petitioner Appellant,
    v.
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Florence.
    Richard Mark Gergel, District
    Judge. (4:10-cv-02325-RMG)

    Submitted:

    July 13, 2011

    Decided:

    July 21, 2011

    Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Ricky Gene Minor, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Ricky
    district

    Gene

    courts

    Minor,

    order

    federal

    accepting

    the

    prisoner,

    appeals

    recommendation

    of

    the
    the

    magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. 2241


    (West 2006 & Supp. 2011) petition.
    and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record

    Accordingly, we affirm for the

    reasons stated by the district court.

    Minor v. United States,

    No. 4:10-cv-02325-RMG (D.S.C. Oct. 25, 2010).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like