United States v. McHan, 4th Cir. (2001)

You might also like

Download as pdf
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6765

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CHARLES WILLIAM MCHAN, SR.,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Bryson City. Richard L. Voorhees,
District Judge. (CR-90-41, CA-98-79-3-2-V)

Submitted:

July 10, 2001

Decided:

August 1, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Charles William McHan, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Timothy Calloway,
United States Attorney, Kenneth Davis Bell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:
Charles W. McHan seeks to appeal the district courts order
denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp.
2000).

We have reviewed the record and the district courts opin-

ion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of


the district court. See United States v. McHan, Nos. CR-90-41; CA98-79-3-2-V (W.D.N.C. Jan. 26, 2001).
the record on appeal.

We deny the motion to amend

We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

DISMISSED

You might also like