Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Question On LIKERT Scale
Question On LIKERT Scale
Respondent/ Year
2007
2.46
2.77
2008
2.78
3.32
2.88
2009
2.27
3.37
2.75
2010
2.40
3.12
2.84
2011
2.57
2.92
2.72
2012
2.41
3.11
3.01
2013
2.41
3.30
2.71
2014
2.54
3.11
2.98
E
2.74
3.1
8
3.1
0
3.4
5
3.2
3
3.1
5
3.1
9
2.9
7
2.79
2.92
2.76
2.73
2.65
2.63
2.35
F
2.7
2
2.8
6
2.7
7
2.9
8
2.7
7
2.8
7
2.9
4
2.7
0
But still I can easily determine the trend line and R Square value from this input.
PROBLEM
Now in year 2015 the same source provides the same information but on a 9 Point Likert Scale.
(Taking 1= Very Bad ,new elements like reasonably Good/ Bad included. 9 = Very Good)
But lets remember that the end points viz. 1 & 9 are exactly same as 1 & 5.
The only change is within the extremes not outside it.
Following picture summarize my understanding of this change in Likert Scales.
Respondent/ Year
Likert 1-5
Likert 1-9
2007
2.46
2008
2.78
3.32
2.88
2009
2.27
3.37
2.75
2010
2.40
3.12
2.84
2011
2.57
2.92
2.72
2012
2.41
3.11
3.01
2013
2.41
3.30
2.71
2014
2.54
2015
6.10
3.11
5.1
1
2.98
3.7
9
( We do not have any other detail except those which are given)
2.77
3.1
8
3.1
0
3.4
5
3.2
3
3.1
5
3.1
9
2.9
7
7.0
5
E
2.7
4
2.7
9
2.9
2
2.7
6
2.7
3
2.6
5
2.6
3
2.3
5
4.9
5
F
2.7
2
2.8
6
2.7
7
2.9
8
2.7
7
2.8
7
2.9
4
2.7
0
7.0
1