Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 47 views

    Odom v. Potter, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    William Odom appealed a magistrate judge's order granting summary judgment to his employer, the Postmaster General, in Odom's retaliation claims. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its order. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The court affirmed the judgment in favor of Odom's employer.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Odom v. Potter, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    47 views2 pages
    William Odom appealed a magistrate judge's order granting summary judgment to his employer, the Postmaster General, in Odom's retaliation claims. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its order. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The court affirmed the judgment in favor of Odom's employer.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-08-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-1183

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    William Odom appealed a magistrate judge's order granting summary judgment to his employer, the Postmaster General, in Odom's retaliation claims. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its order. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The court affirmed the judgment in favor of Odom's employer.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    47 views2 pages

    Odom v. Potter, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    William Odom appealed a magistrate judge's order granting summary judgment to his employer, the Postmaster General, in Odom's retaliation claims. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its order. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The court affirmed the judgment in favor of Odom's employer.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-1183

    WILLIAM N. ODOM, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph R. McCrorey, Magistrate Judge.
    (CA-03-913-3)

    Submitted:

    July 27, 2005

    Decided:

    August 12, 2005

    Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    William N. Odom, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Terri Hearn Bailey, OFFICE
    OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    William N. Odom, Jr., appeals the magistrate judges
    order* granting summary judgment in favor of Odoms employer on his
    retaliation claims.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by


    the district court.

    See Odom v. Potter, No. CA-03-913-3 (D.S.C.

    filed Dec. 17, 2004 & entered Dec. 20, 2004).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    are

    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument


    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate


    judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) (2000).
    - 2 -

    You might also like