Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Tabe v. Gonzales, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Emilia T. Tabe's petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' order denying her motion to reopen her removal proceedings. The court reviewed the administrative record and found that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Tabe's motion, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented. The court thus denied Tabe's petition for review without oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-10-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-1158

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Emilia T. Tabe's petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' order denying her motion to reopen her removal proceedings. The court reviewed the administrative record and found that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Tabe's motion, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented. The court thus denied Tabe's petition for review without oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views2 pages

    Tabe v. Gonzales, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Emilia T. Tabe's petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' order denying her motion to reopen her removal proceedings. The court reviewed the administrative record and found that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Tabe's motion, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented. The court thus denied Tabe's petition for review without oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-1158

    EMILIA T. TABE,
    Petitioner,
    versus
    ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
    Respondent.

    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration


    Appeals. (A75-362-125)

    Submitted:

    September 9, 2005

    Decided:

    October 5, 2005

    Before LUTTIG and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Bokwe G. Mofor, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Paul J.


    McNulty, United States Attorney, R. Joseph Sher, Assistant United
    States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Respondent.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Emilia

    T.

    Tabe,

    native

    and

    citizen

    of

    Cameroon,

    petitions for review from an order of the Board of Immigration


    Appeals (Board) adopting and affirming the immigration judges
    order denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings.

    We have

    reviewed the administrative record and the Boards order and find
    that the Board did not abuse its discretion.

    See INS v. Doherty,

    502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for
    review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED

    - 2 -

    You might also like