Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    Leach v. Smith, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case in which George R. Leach appealed a district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Michael S. Smith, James L. Simmons, Marlene L. Simmons, and the Virginia State Bar. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in Leach v. Smith, No. 4:06-cv-00155-JBF (E.D. Va. July 25, 2007). The appeals court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Leach v. Smith, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case in which George R. Leach appealed a district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Michael S. Smith, James L. Simmons, Marlene L. Simmons, and the Virginia State Bar. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in Leach v. Smith, No. 4:06-cv-00155-JBF (E.D. Va. July 25, 2007). The appeals court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-12-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-1748

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case in which George R. Leach appealed a district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Michael S. Smith, James L. Simmons, Marlene L. Simmons, and the Virginia State Bar. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in Leach v. Smith, No. 4:06-cv-00155-JBF (E.D. Va. July 25, 2007). The appeals court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Leach v. Smith, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case in which George R. Leach appealed a district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Michael S. Smith, James L. Simmons, Marlene L. Simmons, and the Virginia State Bar. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in Leach v. Smith, No. 4:06-cv-00155-JBF (E.D. Va. July 25, 2007). The appeals court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-1748

    GEORGE R. LEACH,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MICHAEL S. SMITH; JAMES L. SIMMONS; MARLENE L.
    SIMMONS; VIRGINIA STATE BAR,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Newport News.
    Jerome B. Friedman,
    District Judge. (4:06-cv-00155-JBF)

    Submitted:

    December 13, 2007

    Decided:

    December 17, 2007

    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    George R. Leach, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Steven Smith, Appellee


    Pro Se; Michael Lowell Heikes, HEIKES & RUGLESS, PC, Williamsburg,
    Virginia; Stephen Michael Hall, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
    VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    George

    R.

    Leach

    appeals

    the

    district

    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 action.


    record and find no reversible error.

    courts

    order

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    See Leach v. Smith, No.

    4:06-cv-00155-JBF (E.D. Va. July 25, 2007).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like