Professional Documents
Culture Documents
United States v. Tonya Pressley, 4th Cir. (2012)
United States v. Tonya Pressley, 4th Cir. (2012)
United States v. Tonya Pressley, 4th Cir. (2012)
No. 12-4080
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg.
Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (7:08-cr-00796-HMH-2)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Tonya Lynn Pressley appeals from her twenty-four-month
sentence imposed upon revocation of her supervised release.
On
whether
Pressleys
sentence
was
plainly
unreasonable.
We affirm.
A
district
court
has
broad
discretion
to
impose
United
We will
reasonableness,
substantive
original
follow[ing]
considerations
sentences.
Id.
that
at
generally
we
employ
438.
the
in
procedural
our
review
supervised
and
of
release
it
is
permitted
revocation case.
to
consider
in
supervised
release
Although the
sentence
in
as
much
detail
as
when
it
imposes
an
original
imposed.
quotation
marks
Thompson,
595
omitted).
F.3d
at
547
revocation
(internal
sentence
is
if
sentence
unreasonable
will
is
we
then
plainly unreasonable.
After
revocation
twenty-four-month
procedurally
decide
whether
or
substantively
the
sentence
is
Id. at 439.
review
sentence
found
of
is
prison
the
record,
not
plainly
term
does
not
we
conclude
that
unreasonable.
exceed
the
the
The
applicable
See
18
U.S.C.
3553(a)(1),
(a)(2)(B)-(C);
U.S.
(2011).
The
district
court
adequately
explained
its
rationale for imposing sentence, and the reasons relied upon are
proper bases for the sentence imposed.
Pressley
filed
pro
se
supplemental
brief
In accordance
and
sentence.
Pressley,
Supreme
Court
in
of
This
writing,
the
United
court
of
the
States
requires
right
for
to
further
that
counsel
petition
review.
the
If
this
court
for
leave
to
withdraw
from
representation.
contentions
the
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED