Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Matthew Pickens v. DOJ, 4th Cir. (2012)
Matthew Pickens v. DOJ, 4th Cir. (2012)
No. 12-6655
DEPARTMENT
OF
JUSTICE;
FEDERAL
BUREAU
OF
Defendants - Appellees,
and
JANICE GALLI MCLEOD, Associate Director of the USDOJ; KEVIN
FRANK MCDONALD, Assistant US Attorney,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston.
R. Bryan Harwell, District
Judge. (2:11-cv-01168-RBH)
Submitted:
Decided:
October 1, 2012
Pro Se.
Attorney,
Barbara Murcier
Columbia, South
PER CURIAM:
Matthew
courts
order
Thomas
accepting
Pickens
the
appeals
magistrate
from
the
judges
district
recommendation
written
objections
ten
appeal.
Wright
within
v.
days
766
Collins,
waives
F.2d
the
841,
right
845-46
to
(4th
an
Cir.
1985); United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 93-94 (4th Cir.
1984).
The
requirement
to
make
objections
preserves
the
Wright,
766
F.2d
at
845,
and
conserves
judicial
after
the
recommendations.
magistrate
judge
has
made
findings
and
If
party
does
not
file
specific
written
raised
in
Pickens
Id.
magistrate
finding
or
report,
recommendation
on
party
that
must
issue
object
with
to
the
sufficient
failed
that
Defendants
finding
Pickens
to
Id.
object
properly
to
the
magistrate
withheld
some
judges
information
Pickens
has
waived
appellate
review
with
oral
argument
because
the
facts
and
of
We
legal
DISMISSED