Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    United States v. Johnson, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Lester Johnson appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) and the denial of his motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's rulings, agreeing with the reasons stated by the lower court in denying Johnson's motions. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Johnson, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Lester Johnson appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) and the denial of his motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's rulings, agreeing with the reasons stated by the lower court in denying Johnson's motions. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-11-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-6066

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Lester Johnson appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) and the denial of his motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's rulings, agreeing with the reasons stated by the lower court in denying Johnson's motions. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Johnson, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Lester Johnson appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) and the denial of his motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's rulings, agreeing with the reasons stated by the lower court in denying Johnson's motions. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-6066

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    LESTER JOHNSON, a/k/a Main,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
    Judge. (3:95-cr-00488-JFA)

    Submitted:

    November 17, 2009

    Decided:

    November 20, 2009

    Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Lester Johnson, Appellant


    United
    States
    Attorney,
    Appellee.

    Pro Se.
    Sean Kittrell, Assistant
    Charleston,
    South
    Carolina,
    for

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Lester

    Johnson

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    orders

    denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18


    U.S.C.

    3582(c)

    (2006)
    have

    and

    denying

    reviewed

    the

    his

    motion

    record

    and

    find

    for

    reconsideration.

    We

    no

    reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated


    See United States v. Johnson, No. 3:95-

    by the district court.

    cr-00488-JFA (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 2009 & June 22, 2009).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like