Professional Documents
Culture Documents
United States v. Octavius Fryar, 4th Cir. (2012)
United States v. Octavius Fryar, 4th Cir. (2012)
United States v. Octavius Fryar, 4th Cir. (2012)
No. 12-4371
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington.
Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (7:11-cr-00146-H-1)
Submitted:
NIEMEYER,
Decided:
Circuit
December 4, 2012
Judges,
and
HAMILTON,
PER CURIAM:
Octavius Fryar appeals the district courts judgment
finding
he
violated
his
conditions
of
supervised
release,
revoking his supervised release and sentencing him to twentyfour months in prison.
substantively unreasonable.
This
court
will
affirm
sentence
imposed
after
Crudup,
district
461
court
F.3d
433,
must
438-40
consider
(4th
the
Cir.
United States
2006).
Chapter
Seven
While
policy
supervised
reasonable
release
if
the
revocation
district
court
sentence
is
considered
the
And although the district court need not explain the reasons for
imposing a revocation sentence in as much detail as when it
2
reasons
for
the
sentence
imposed.
United
States
v.
Thompson, 595 F.3d 544, 547 (4th Cir. 2010) (internal quotation
marks
omitted).
reasonable
if
the
revocation
district
court
sentence
is
stated
proper
substantively
basis
for
is
found
procedurally
or
substantively
Only if a
unreasonable
record
and
have
considered
the
We have reviewed
parties
arguments
and
dispense
contentions
with
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
facts
and
the
materials
legal
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED