Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Charles Walker, Sr. v. Mildred Rivera, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Charles Walker appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's denial of Walker's petition. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its September 2011 order. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-03-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-7425

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Charles Walker appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's denial of Walker's petition. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its September 2011 order. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Charles Walker, Sr. v. Mildred Rivera, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Charles Walker appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's denial of Walker's petition. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its September 2011 order. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-7425

    CHARLES W. WALKER, SR.,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    MILDRED RIVERA, Warden FCI Estill,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia. Richard M. Gergel, District Judge.
    (3:10-cv-02464-RMG)

    Submitted:

    February 22, 2012

    Decided:

    March 1, 2012

    Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Charles W. Walker, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.


    Robert Frank Daley,
    Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina,
    for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Charles W. Walker, Sr. appeals the district courts
    order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. 2241 (West 2006 &
    Supp. 2011) petition.
    reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    See Walker v. Rivera, No. 3:10-cv-02464-

    RMG (D.S.C. filed Sept. 26, 2011; entered Sept. 27, 2011).
    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    We

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like