Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views1 page
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from June 5, 1989. It involves a pro se plaintiff, Steve Alexander Kirkpatrick, appealing the denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal had no merit based on the district court's reasoning. The facts and legal arguments were adequately represented, so oral arguments were not necessary.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1989-06-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 877 F.2d 59 Docket: 89-7572

    Original Title

    Steve Alexander Kirkpatrick v. Warden Dixon, Aaron Johnson, Department of Correction Institute in the Health Care Administration, 877 F.2d 59, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from June 5, 1989. It involves a pro se plaintiff, Steve Alexander Kirkpatrick, appealing the denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal had no merit based on the district court's reasoning. The facts and legal arguments were adequately represented, so oral arguments were not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views1 page

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from June 5, 1989. It involves a pro se plaintiff, Steve Alexander Kirkpatrick, appealing the denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal had no merit based on the district court's reasoning. The facts and legal arguments were adequately represented, so oral arguments were not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    877 F.

    2d 59
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Steve Alexander KIRKPATRICK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Warden DIXON, Aaron Johnson, Department of Correction
    Institute in the Health Care Administration,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 89-7572.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted April 28, 1989.
    Decided June 5, 1989.

    Steve Alexander Kirkpatrick, appellant pro se.


    Before K.K. HALL, PHILLIPS, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Steve Alexander Kirkpatrick appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district
    court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we
    affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kirkpatrick v. Dixon, C/A No. 88976-CRT (E.D.N.C. Mar. 2, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like