Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 15 views

    United States v. Washington, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Lionel James Washington appealed the district court's denial of his motion to compel the Government to file a motion to reduce his sentence under Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Washington, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    15 views2 pages
    Lionel James Washington appealed the district court's denial of his motion to compel the Government to file a motion to reduce his sentence under Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-03-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-7540

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Lionel James Washington appealed the district court's denial of his motion to compel the Government to file a motion to reduce his sentence under Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    15 views2 pages

    United States v. Washington, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Lionel James Washington appealed the district court's denial of his motion to compel the Government to file a motion to reduce his sentence under Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-7540

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    LIONEL JAMES WASHINGTON,
    Defendant Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
    Judge. (3:08-cr-00612-JFA-1)

    Submitted:

    February 24, 2011

    Decided:

    March 3, 2011

    Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Lionel James Washington, Appellant Pro Se.


    John David Rowell,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Lionel James Washington appeals the district courts
    order denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Fed.
    R. Crim. P. 35 motion to reduce his sentence.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    United States v.

    Washington, No. 3:08-cr-00612-JFA-1 (D.S.C. Oct. 25, 2010).


    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    We

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like