Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Brown v. Lindsey, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views3 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of John Wayne Brown v. various prison officials. The court affirmed the district court's order denying relief on Brown's civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The appellate court conducted a review of the record and district court opinion accepting the magistrate's recommendation and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the court affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in its opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-11-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-6850

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of John Wayne Brown v. various prison officials. The court affirmed the district court's order denying relief on Brown's civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The appellate court conducted a review of the record and district court opinion accepting the magistrate's recommendation and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the court affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in its opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views3 pages

    Brown v. Lindsey, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of John Wayne Brown v. various prison officials. The court affirmed the district court's order denying relief on Brown's civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The appellate court conducted a review of the record and district court opinion accepting the magistrate's recommendation and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the court affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in its opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-6850

    JOHN WAYNE BROWN,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    SERGEANT LINDSEY; SERGEANT COREA;
    CRENSHAW; L. SMITH; VENABLE,

    SERGEANT
    Defendants- Appellees,

    and
    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Gilmore; CAPTAIN
    GOODE; M. HANKS, Lieutenant; B. HICKS, Sergeant; DAVID GEORGE; E. KIRKON; LIF; SHAW;
    DUNN; E. MURRAY, Director, D.O.C.; E. MORRIS,
    Deputy Director D.O.C.; JAMES BRIGGS, ManagerOmbudsman Ser.; W. P. ROGERS, Regional Administrator; E. H. PALMER, Req. Ombuds.; J.
    HOLMES, Req. Ombuds.; C. H. ALLEN, Req.
    Ombuds.; WARDEN THOMPSON; HESLER, Assistant
    Warden; CAPTAIN RAINEY; LIEUTENANT HAWKINS;
    LIEUTENANT PULLEY; LIEUTENANT RIPPER; LIEUTENANT RICE; T. C. BULLOCK, Hearings Officer;
    S. WHITTEN, Grieve. Coor.; S. HARRIS, Asst.
    Grieve. Coor.; E. PENIC, Asst. Grieve. Coor.;
    E. TUCK, Asst. Grieve. Coor.; H. LOVELACE,
    Assist. Grieve. Coor.; T. KALLAM, Assist.
    Grieve. Coor.; SERGEANT BOYD; D. CAMPBELL; V.
    BRUMMEL; THOMPSON; C.O. THOMPSON; SERGEANT
    CAREY; C.O. BOYD,
    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-94-895-AM)

    Submitted:

    September 30, 1998

    Decided:

    November 10, 1998

    Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    John Wayne Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Vaughan Christopher Jones,
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    John Wayne Brown appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We
    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion accepting
    the magistrate judges recommendation and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    Brown v. Lindsey, No. CA-94-895-AM (E.D. Va. May 12, 1998). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like