Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Casey v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views3 pages
    Donald Casey, an inmate, filed a §1983 complaint against numerous prison officials alleging civil rights violations. The district court denied relief, accepting the magistrate's recommendation. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit denied Casey's motion to reassess filing fees and affirmed the district court's denial of relief based on the reasoning in its opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-04-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-7420

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Donald Casey, an inmate, filed a §1983 complaint against numerous prison officials alleging civil rights violations. The district court denied relief, accepting the magistrate's recommendation. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit denied Casey's motion to reassess filing fees and affirmed the district court's denial of relief based on the reasoning in its opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views3 pages

    Casey v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Donald Casey, an inmate, filed a §1983 complaint against numerous prison officials alleging civil rights violations. The district court denied relief, accepting the magistrate's recommendation. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit denied Casey's motion to reassess filing fees and affirmed the district court's denial of relief based on the reasoning in its opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-7420

    DONALD E. CASEY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    RON ANGELONE, Director, Department of Corrections; G. JOHNSON, Deputy Director, Department
    of Corrections; ROBERT H. YOUNG, Regional
    Director, Department of Corrections; R. C.
    MATHENA, Correctional Officer Supervisor, Keen
    Mountain Correctional Center; GEORGE DEEDS,
    Warden; GENE SHINAULT, Assistant Warden Programs; M. SPRADLING, Treatment Program Supervisor; LIEUTENANT PAYNE, Security Officer;
    SERGEANT SCOTT, Security Officer; SERGEANT
    BLANSETT, Security Officer; SERGEANT KELLY;
    Security Officer; SERGEANT DAVIS, Security
    Officer; SERGEANT HARRISON; Security Officer;
    SERGEANT HONAKER, Security Officer; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER WICKS; OFFICER KISER; OFFICER
    COMPTON; OFFICER MULLINS; OFFICER VANDYKE;
    OFFICER SHRIEVE; OFFICER CULBERTSON; COUNSELOR
    VASS; MOISES E. QUINONES, Staff Physician; MS.
    GILBERT, Staff Nurse; MS. MULLINS, Staff
    Nurse; D. ROSE, Staff Nurse; NURSE LESTER,
    Staff Nurse; JANET SALYERS, Disciplinary
    Hearing Officer; SUSIE COX, Institutional
    Ombudsman; L. FLEMING, Lieutenant, Security
    Officer; R. FLEMING, Lieutenant, Security
    Officer,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    James C. Turk, District Judge.
    (CA-97-573-R)

    Submitted:

    March 16, 1999

    Decided:

    April 1, 1999

    Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Donald E. Casey, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant
    Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Ronald D. Hodges, Mark Dudley
    Obenshain, Gene Rodney Young, II, WHARTON, ALDHIZER & WEAVER,
    Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Donald E. Casey appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint.

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion accepting
    the magistrate judges recommendation and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we deny Caseys motion to reassess his filing fee and
    affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    No. CA-97-573-R (W.D. Va. Aug. 28, 1998).

    Casey v. Angelone,

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like