Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Reynolds v. Fairfax Cnty Public Schools, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views3 pages
    This document is a summary of a United States Court of Appeals case from 1999. It affirms the district court's dismissal of a civil action filed by Ollye Tine Snow Reynolds and Bobby Reynolds against several Virginia school systems and entities. The appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's rulings, which included orders dismissing the case and denying various post-judgment motions. The court dispensed with oral arguments and denied motions to defer consideration of the appeal and for a restraining order.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-11-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-1685

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a summary of a United States Court of Appeals case from 1999. It affirms the district court's dismissal of a civil action filed by Ollye Tine Snow Reynolds and Bobby Reynolds against several Virginia school systems and entities. The appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's rulings, which included orders dismissing the case and denying various post-judgment motions. The court dispensed with oral arguments and denied motions to defer consideration of the appeal and for a restraining order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views3 pages

    Reynolds v. Fairfax Cnty Public Schools, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a summary of a United States Court of Appeals case from 1999. It affirms the district court's dismissal of a civil action filed by Ollye Tine Snow Reynolds and Bobby Reynolds against several Virginia school systems and entities. The appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's rulings, which included orders dismissing the case and denying various post-judgment motions. The court dispensed with oral arguments and denied motions to defer consideration of the appeal and for a restraining order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-1685

    OLLYE TINE SNOW REYNOLDS; BOBBY O. REYNOLDS,


    Plaintiffs - Appellants,
    versus
    FAIRFAX COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS; FAIRFAX COUNTY
    SCHOOL BOARD; ROBERT SPILLANE, Former Superintendent; ALAN LEIS, Former Director of Personnel then Deputy Superintendent, now Interim;
    LOUDOUN COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS; MANASSAS CITY
    PUBLIC SCHOOLS; FALLS CHURCH CITY PUBLIC
    SCHOOLS; ARLINGTON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS,
    Defendants - Appellees,
    and
    ST. MARYS COLLEGE,
    Defendant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District
    Judge; Theresa Carroll Buchanan, Magistrate Judge. (CA-98-1077-A)

    Submitted:

    October 14, 1999

    Decided:

    Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    November 5, 1999

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Ollye Tine Snow Reynolds, Bobby O. Reynolds, Appellants Pro Se.
    Ingo Frank Burghardt, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, McLean, Virginia; Richard
    Mark Dare, HAZEL & THOMAS, P.C., Falls Church, Virginia; Martin
    Ritchie Crim, SMITH & DAVENPORT, Manassas, Virginia; Francis Joseph
    Prior, Jr., SICILIANO, ELLIS, DYER & BOCCAROSSE; Carol Winfield
    McCoskrie, COUNTY ATTORNEYS OFFICE, Arlington, Virginia, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Ollye Tine Snow Reynolds and Bobby Reynolds appeal from the
    district courts orders dismissing this civil action and denying
    the motion for reconsideration and other post-judgment motions. We
    have reviewed the record and the district courts orders and find
    no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

    the district court. See Reynolds v. Fairfax County Pub. Sch. Sys.,
    No. CA-98-1077-A (E.D. Va. July 24, Sept. 27, Sept. 28, Oct. 14,
    Oct. 27, Dec. 19, Dec. 29, 1998 & Jan. 5, Jan. 11, Jan. 22, Feb. 1,
    Feb. 2, Feb. 9, Feb. 26, Mar. 19, Apr. 13, and Apr. 26, 1999).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    The motions to de-

    fer consideration of the appeal and for a restraining order are


    denied.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like