Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Frederick Washington v. State of North Carolina, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Frederick Lawrence Washington appealed the district court's denial of his motions to reconsider its order denying his habeas corpus petition. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and agreed with the reasons stated by the district court in its May 3 and November 3, 2011 orders denying Washington's habeas petition in Washington v. North Carolina, No. 5:09-hc-02068-D. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-04-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-7515

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Frederick Lawrence Washington appealed the district court's denial of his motions to reconsider its order denying his habeas corpus petition. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and agreed with the reasons stated by the district court in its May 3 and November 3, 2011 orders denying Washington's habeas petition in Washington v. North Carolina, No. 5:09-hc-02068-D. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Frederick Washington v. State of North Carolina, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Frederick Lawrence Washington appealed the district court's denial of his motions to reconsider its order denying his habeas corpus petition. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and agreed with the reasons stated by the district court in its May 3 and November 3, 2011 orders denying Washington's habeas petition in Washington v. North Carolina, No. 5:09-hc-02068-D. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-7515

    FREDERICK LAWRENCE WASHINGTON,


    Petitioner Appellant,
    v.
    STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    James C. Dever III,
    Chief District Judge. (5:09-hc-02068-D)

    Submitted:

    March 26, 2012

    Decided:

    April 9, 2012

    Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Frederick Lawrence Washington, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Frederick
    courts

    order

    Lawrence

    denying

    his

    Washington
    motions

    to

    appeals

    affirm

    Washington

    for
    v.

    the

    reasons

    North

    May 3 & Nov. 3, 2011).

    stated

    Carolina,

    No.

    district

    reconsider.

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.


    we

    the

    by

    the

    We

    have

    Accordingly,

    district

    5:09-hc-02068-D

    court.

    (E.D.N.C.

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like