Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fauzi v. Gonzales, 4th Cir. (2006)
Fauzi v. Gonzales, 4th Cir. (2006)
No. 06-1153
SUMARNI FAUZI,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General of the
United States,
Respondent.
No. 06-1641
SUMARNI FAUZI,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General of the
United States,
Respondent.
Submitted:
Decided:
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Sumarni Fauzi, a native
and citizen of Indonesia, challenges two orders of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (Board). In No. 06-1153, Fauzi seeks review of
an order of the Board affirming the immigration judges order
denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and
protection under the Convention Against Torture.*
In No. 06-1641,
324 n.13 (4th Cir. 2002) (citing INS v. Stevic, 467 U.S. 407, 430
(1984)).
Based
on
our
review
of
the
record,
we
find
that
protection,
petitioner
bears
the
burden
To qualify for
of
proof
of
showing.
Finally, in No. 06-1641, Fauzi challenges the Boards
denial of her motion to reopen.
323-24 (1992); Barry v. Gonzales, 445 F.3d 741, 744 (4th Cir.
2006), petition for cert. filed, __ U.S.L.W. __ (U.S. Sept. 18,
2006) (No. 06-6650).
with
extreme
deference,
since
immigration
statutes
do
not
M.A. v. INS, 899 F.2d 304, 308 (4th Cir. 1990) (en banc).
This court reverses the Boards denial of such a motion only if the
denial is arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.
F.3d at 745.
Barry, 445
We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITIONS DENIED
- 4 -