Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 0 views

    Vanover v. Shams, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Jilla Vanover's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The district court had dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The Fourth Circuit concluded that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented to the lower court and oral arguments were not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Vanover v. Shams, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views3 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Jilla Vanover's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The district court had dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The Fourth Circuit concluded that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented to the lower court and oral arguments were not necessary.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-06-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-1016

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Jilla Vanover's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The district court had dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The Fourth Circuit concluded that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented to the lower court and oral arguments were not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views3 pages

    Vanover v. Shams, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Jilla Vanover's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The district court had dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The Fourth Circuit concluded that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented to the lower court and oral arguments were not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-1016

    JILLA N. VANOVER, RN, BSN, BA,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    and
    ANGELTOUCH HOME HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INCORPORATED,
    Plaintiff,
    v.
    ALAN SHAMS; CYNTHIA SHAMS; CHARLES JAMES SWEDISH, Attorney
    at Law; BANK OF NEW YORK; SAMUEL I. WHITE, PC; ADAMS WHITE;
    ERIC WHITE; J. SILVER, Mr.; R. LUECK, Mr., Revenue Officer,
    AGM; MR. CONTE, Collector; DEBORAH C. STANLEY, Ms.,
    Associate Area Council in Richmond; MICHAEL LENIHAM, Mr.
    Technical Service Advisory Group Manager; MRS. HANA,
    Auditor;
    MRS.
    CARR,
    Supervisor
    of
    Auditors;
    FATEMEH
    NAJAFIAN, Ms., MD; THOMAS KIM, Mr., Special Agent, Special
    Inquiries and Intelligence Division, Department of Treasury,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Leonie M. Brinkema,
    District Judge. (1:08-cv-01037-LMB-IDD)

    Submitted:

    May 28, 2009

    Decided:

    Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    June 5, 2009

    Jilla N. Vanover, Appellant Pro Se.


    Michael Todd Freeman,
    SAMUEL I. WHITE, PC, Richmond, Virginia; Ronald James Guillot,
    Jr., SAMUEL I. WHITE, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Jonathan S.
    Cohen, Christine Durney Mason, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
    JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Robert K. Coulter, Assistant United
    States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Jilla N. Vanover appeals the district courts order
    dismissing her 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
    1915(e)(2)(B) (2006).
    reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    Vanover v. Shams, No. 1:08-cv-01037-LMB-

    IDD (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 23, 2008 & entered Oct. 23, 2008;
    Oct. 28,
    facts

    2008).

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We

    dispense

    contentions
    the

    court

    with

    oral

    argument

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    because

    presented

    would

    not

    the

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like