Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unpublished
Unpublished
No. 08-5162
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
Robert J. Conrad,
Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:06-cr-00451-RJC-1)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Kendrick
Omar
Hammond
appeals
his
conviction
that
conditional
guilty
plea
and
reserved
his
Hammond
right
to
We affirm.
We
underlying
review
a
motion
the
to
district
suppress
courts
for
factual
clear
error,
findings
and
the
United States v.
When a suppression
motion has been denied, this court reviews the evidence in the
light most favorable to the Government.
Id.
great
based
deference
decisions.
to
factual
findings
credibility
gives
an
officer
probable
cause
to
stop
the
driver.
United States v. Hassan El, 5 F.3d 726, 730 (4th Cir. 1993).
stop
for
traffic
violation
does
not
become
unreasonable
of
the
Id.
car
are
engaged
in
some
sort
of
criminal
2008).
Hammond
argues
that
the
stop
of
his
vehicle
was
record
leads
us
to
conclude,
however,
Our review of
that
the
district
To establish
2007).
correction
Even
of
if
the
Hammond
error
satisfies
remains
these
within
requirements,
[the
courts]
even
examining
assuming
the
that
video,
the
such
district
error
did
court
not
erred
affect
in
not
Hammonds
or
citations
to
the
hearing
transcript
to
stop
motivated
under
law
Fourth
Amendment
enforcement
can
analysis,
violate
the
equal
racially
protection
United
In
order
motivated
to
law
establish
that
enforcement,
he
is
[t]he
the
victim
claimant
of
must
and
that
it
was
motivated
by
discriminatory
United States v.
the
equal
protection
test.
This
argument
is
therefore
without merit.
Accordingly,
dispense
with
oral
we
affirm
argument
Hammonds
because
the
conviction.
facts
and
We
legal