Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    John Turner v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of John Paul Turner's motion for reconsideration under Rule 60(b). Turner had appealed the district court's denial of his habeas corpus petition challenging his state conviction. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny the motion for reconsideration, agreeing with the reasons stated by the district court. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials submitted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    John Turner v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of John Paul Turner's motion for reconsideration under Rule 60(b). Turner had appealed the district court's denial of his habeas corpus petition challenging his state conviction. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny the motion for reconsideration, agreeing with the reasons stated by the district court. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials submitted.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-10-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-1591

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of John Paul Turner's motion for reconsideration under Rule 60(b). Turner had appealed the district court's denial of his habeas corpus petition challenging his state conviction. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny the motion for reconsideration, agreeing with the reasons stated by the district court. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials submitted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    John Turner v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of John Paul Turner's motion for reconsideration under Rule 60(b). Turner had appealed the district court's denial of his habeas corpus petition challenging his state conviction. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny the motion for reconsideration, agreeing with the reasons stated by the district court. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials submitted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-1591

    JOHN PAUL TURNER,


    Petitioner Appellant,
    v.
    COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,
    Respondent Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    Samuel G. Wilson, District
    Judge. (7:10-cv-00555-SGW-mfu)

    Submitted:

    September 16, 2011

    Decided:

    October 7, 2011

    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    John Paul Turner appeals the district courts order
    denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration.
    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    Turner v. Virginia, No. 7:10-cv-00555-SGW-mfu (W.D. Va.

    court.

    May 27, 2011).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like