Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Woods v. State of SC, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Stanley Eugene Woods filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the State of South Carolina and the South Carolina Department of Corrections which was denied by the district court. Woods appealed the denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny Woods' complaint. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-01-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-7459

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Stanley Eugene Woods filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the State of South Carolina and the South Carolina Department of Corrections which was denied by the district court. Woods appealed the denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny Woods' complaint. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Woods v. State of SC, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Stanley Eugene Woods filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the State of South Carolina and the South Carolina Department of Corrections which was denied by the district court. Woods appealed the denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny Woods' complaint. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-7459

    STANLEY EUGENE WOODS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA;
    DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

    SOUTH

    CAROLINA
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia.
    G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
    Judge. (CA-94-3283-3-3BC)
    Submitted:

    January 11, 1996

    Decided:

    January 24, 1996

    Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Stanley Eugene Woods, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Coleman Jones,
    BOGOSLOW & JONES, Walterboro, South Carolina; Donald John Zelenka,
    Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for
    Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the
    record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate
    judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
    we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Woods v. South
    Carolina, No. CA-94-3283-3-3BC (D.S.C. Aug. 28, 1995). We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like