Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 32 views

    Luke v. Dare County, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Debbie Luke filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Dare County and the County Manager alleging violations of her civil rights. The district court denied relief to Luke. Luke appealed the district court's decision. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As such, the appellate court affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief to Luke.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Luke v. Dare County, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    32 views2 pages
    Debbie Luke filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Dare County and the County Manager alleging violations of her civil rights. The district court denied relief to Luke. Luke appealed the district court's decision. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As such, the appellate court affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief to Luke.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-08-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-1227

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Debbie Luke filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Dare County and the County Manager alleging violations of her civil rights. The district court denied relief to Luke. Luke appealed the district court's decision. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As such, the appellate court affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief to Luke.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    32 views2 pages

    Luke v. Dare County, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Debbie Luke filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Dare County and the County Manager alleging violations of her civil rights. The district court denied relief to Luke. Luke appealed the district court's decision. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As such, the appellate court affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief to Luke.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-1227

    DEBBIE LUKE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DARE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, a Political
    Subdivision of the State of North Carolina,
    Defendant - Appellee,
    and
    TERRY WHEELER, in his official capacity as
    County Manager of Dare County, North Carolina,
    Defendant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Malcolm J. Howard,
    District Judge. (CA-01-15-2-H-2)

    Submitted:

    August 20, 2002

    Decided:

    August 29, 2002

    Before MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    John D. Leidy, HORNTHAL, RILEY, ELLIS & MALAND, L.L.P., Elizabeth


    City, North Carolina, for Appellant.
    Mark A. Davis, WOMBLE,
    CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Debbie Luke appeals the district courts order denying relief
    on her 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 2002) complaint.

    We have

    reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find no
    reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

    district court. Luke v. Dare County, North Carolina, No. CA-01-152-H-2 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 6, 2002).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like