Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Turner v. Dotson, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    Robert Douglas Turner filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. Turner appealed the denial. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's denial for the reasons stated in its decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately represented in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-05-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-6041

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Robert Douglas Turner filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. Turner appealed the denial. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's denial for the reasons stated in its decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately represented in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views2 pages

    Turner v. Dotson, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Robert Douglas Turner filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. Turner appealed the denial. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's denial for the reasons stated in its decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately represented in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-6041

    ROBERT DOUGLAS TURNER,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    LEHRMAN DOTSON;
    THOMPSON,

    DWIGHT

    P.

    JOHNSON;

    ERIC
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
    (CA-05-1878-RDB)

    Submitted: May 16, 2006

    Decided: May 22, 2006

    Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Robert Douglas Turner, Appellant Pro Se. David Phelps Kennedy,


    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,
    for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Robert Douglas Turner appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See Turner v.

    Dotson, No. CA-05-1878-RDB (D. Md. Dec. 8, 2005). We dispense with


    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions

    are

    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument


    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like