Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re: Eugene Brinson, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Eugene Brinson's petition for a writ of mandamus against the district court. Brinson alleged that the district court unduly delayed acting on his post-judgment motions. The Court of Appeals concluded that there had been no undue delay by the district court. While allowing Brinson to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court denied the mandamus petition without prejudice, allowing Brinson to file another petition if the district court does not act expeditiously on his pending post-judgment motions.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-12-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-1715

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Eugene Brinson's petition for a writ of mandamus against the district court. Brinson alleged that the district court unduly delayed acting on his post-judgment motions. The Court of Appeals concluded that there had been no undue delay by the district court. While allowing Brinson to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court denied the mandamus petition without prejudice, allowing Brinson to file another petition if the district court does not act expeditiously on his pending post-judgment motions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    In Re: Eugene Brinson, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Eugene Brinson's petition for a writ of mandamus against the district court. Brinson alleged that the district court unduly delayed acting on his post-judgment motions. The Court of Appeals concluded that there had been no undue delay by the district court. While allowing Brinson to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court denied the mandamus petition without prejudice, allowing Brinson to file another petition if the district court does not act expeditiously on his pending post-judgment motions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-1715

    In re:

    EUGENE KENNETH BRINSON,


    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:07-cv-00592-HEH)

    Submitted:

    December 2, 2011

    Decided:

    December 22, 2011

    Before DUNCAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Eugene Kenneth Brinson, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Eugene

    Kenneth

    Brinson

    petitions

    for

    writ

    of

    mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed


    acting on his post-judgment motions.

    He seeks an order from

    this court directing the district court to act.


    that

    there

    has

    been

    no

    undue

    delay

    in

    the

    We conclude

    district

    court.

    Therefore, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis,


    we deny the mandamus petition without prejudice to the filing of
    another mandamus petition if the district court does not act
    expeditiously on the pending post-judgment motions.

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED

    You might also like