Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Joey Priddy v. John Garman, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case in which Joey Kenneth Priddy appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its opinion. The Court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-08-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-6659

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case in which Joey Kenneth Priddy appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its opinion. The Court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Joey Priddy v. John Garman, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case in which Joey Kenneth Priddy appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its opinion. The Court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-6659

    JOEY KENNETH PRIDDY,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    JOHN GARMAN, Regional Director;
    GENNY BANDY, Operations Manager,

    LARRY

    W.

    JARVIS,

    Warden;

    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    Glen E. Conrad, Chief
    District Judge. (7:12-cv-00017-GEC)

    Submitted:

    July 26, 2012

    Decided:

    August 2, 2012

    Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Joey Kenneth Priddy, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Joey Kenneth Priddy appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Priddy v. Garman, No. 7:12-cv-00017 (W.D. Va. Mar. 14,

    2012).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like