Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unpublished
Unpublished
Unpublished
No. 03-4397
Submitted:
March 6, 2006
Decided:
May 4, 2006
PER CURIAM:
On
September
15,
2004,
we
affirmed
Ronnell
Kings
Appx. 504 (4th Cir. Sept. 15, 2004) (unpublished). On January 24,
2005,
the
Supreme
Court
of
the
United
States
granted
Kings
Booker,
the
Supreme
Court
held
that
Blakely
v.
244.
Although King objected to the enhancements at issue, his
objections did not rest on the rule in Blakely.
- 2 -
Therefore, this
Although the
On
The
court should consider this sentencing range along with the other
factors described in 18 U.S.C. 3553(a), and then impose a
sentence.
Id.
range, the court should explain its reasons for the departure as
required by 18 U.S.C. 3553(c)(2).
Id.
Id. at
547; see also United States v. Green, 436 F.3d 449 (4th Cir. 2006).
Accordingly, although we affirm Kings convictions, we
vacate his sentence and remand for further consideration in light
of Booker.
AFFIRMED IN PART;
VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART
- 4 -