Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Tremayne Mabry v. G. Bowles, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case in which Tremayne Juandal Mabry appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Dr. G. Bowles. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-09-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-6446

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case in which Tremayne Juandal Mabry appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Dr. G. Bowles. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Tremayne Mabry v. G. Bowles, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case in which Tremayne Juandal Mabry appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Dr. G. Bowles. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-6446

    TREMAYNE JUANDAL MABRY,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    G. BOWLES, Dr., Dentist,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    T.S. Ellis, III, Senior
    District Judge. (1:13-cv-00235-TSE-JFA)

    Submitted:

    August 28, 2014

    Decided:

    September 2, 2014

    Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Tremayne Juandal Mabry, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Douglas Lane,


    THOMPSON MCMULLAN PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Tremayne

    Juandal

    Mabry

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint.


    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    See Mabry v. Bowles, No. 1:13-cv-00235-TSE-JFA (E.D. Va.

    Feb. 24, 2014).


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the


    contentions

    are

    adequately

    this

    and

    argument

    court

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like