Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Toulan v. DAP, Incorporated, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment to DAP, Inc. on Faye Robin Toulan's claims of retaliation, gender and national origin discrimination under Title VII, and salary discrimination under the Equal Pay Act. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The Court also denied Toulan's request to defer action pending a Supreme Court case and denied DAP's request for costs associated with filing a supplemental appendix.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-03-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-1086

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment to DAP, Inc. on Faye Robin Toulan's claims of retaliation, gender and national origin discrimination under Title VII, and salary discrimination under the Equal Pay Act. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The Court also denied Toulan's request to defer action pending a Supreme Court case and denied DAP's request for costs associated with filing a supplemental appendix.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Toulan v. DAP, Incorporated, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment to DAP, Inc. on Faye Robin Toulan's claims of retaliation, gender and national origin discrimination under Title VII, and salary discrimination under the Equal Pay Act. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The Court also denied Toulan's request to defer action pending a Supreme Court case and denied DAP's request for costs associated with filing a supplemental appendix.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-1086

    FAYE ROBIN TOULAN,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DAP, INCORPORATED,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
    (1:05-cv-02254-CCB)

    Submitted:

    January 28, 2008

    Decided:

    March 26, 2008

    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael J. Snider, Ari Taragin, Jason I. Weisbrot, Jacob Statman,


    SNIDER & ASSOCIATES, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant.
    Douglas M. Topolski, Elena D. Marcuss, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP,
    Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Faye Robin Toulan appeals the district courts order
    granting DAP, Incorporateds (DAP) summary judgment motion on her
    retaliation

    and

    gender

    and

    national

    origin

    (American)

    discrimination claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil


    Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e to 2000e-17
    (2000), and her salary discrimination claim, brought pursuant to
    the Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. 206(d) (2000).
    record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    See Toulan v. DAP, Inc.,

    No. 1:05-cv-02254-CCB (D. Md. Jan. 17, 2007).*

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    are

    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument


    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    We deny Toulans Fed. R. App. P. 28(j) request to defer


    action on her appeal pending the Supreme Courts consideration of
    CBOCS West, Inc. v. Humphries, 128 S. Ct. 30 (2007), and deny DAPs
    outstanding request for costs associated with the filing of a
    supplemental appendix.
    - 2 -

    You might also like