Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    Hill v. Novack-Hill, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ricky Hill appealed a district court's dismissal of his case seeking a paternity test to overturn a state child support order in favor of Diane Novack-Hill. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling that it lacked jurisdiction over the case. The appeals court found no errors in the district court's reasoning that Hill's action was an attempt to overturn a state court ruling, over which the federal courts have no jurisdiction. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Hill v. Novack-Hill, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Ricky Hill appealed a district court's dismissal of his case seeking a paternity test to overturn a state child support order in favor of Diane Novack-Hill. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling that it lacked jurisdiction over the case. The appeals court found no errors in the district court's reasoning that Hill's action was an attempt to overturn a state court ruling, over which the federal courts have no jurisdiction. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-01-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-2526

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ricky Hill appealed a district court's dismissal of his case seeking a paternity test to overturn a state child support order in favor of Diane Novack-Hill. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling that it lacked jurisdiction over the case. The appeals court found no errors in the district court's reasoning that Hill's action was an attempt to overturn a state court ruling, over which the federal courts have no jurisdiction. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Hill v. Novack-Hill, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ricky Hill appealed a district court's dismissal of his case seeking a paternity test to overturn a state child support order in favor of Diane Novack-Hill. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling that it lacked jurisdiction over the case. The appeals court found no errors in the district court's reasoning that Hill's action was an attempt to overturn a state court ruling, over which the federal courts have no jurisdiction. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-2526

    RICKY HILL,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DIANE R. NOVACK-HILL,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (CA-96-35-2-BO)
    Submitted:

    January 23, 1997

    Decided:

    January 29, 1997

    Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Ricky Hill, Appellant Pro Se.
    Se.

    Diane R. Novack-Hill, Appellee Pro

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing for
    lack of jurisdiction his civil action seeking a standard paternity
    test in an effort to overturn a state court child support order. We
    have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find
    no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
    district court. Hill v. Novack-Hill, No. CA-96-35-2-BO (E.D.N.C.
    Oct. 11, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like