Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    In Re: Charles Izac V., 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Charles Izac filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging his 2006 sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed the petition, as it ordinarily declines to entertain original habeas petitions under 28 U.S.C. 2241. The court also found that transferring the case to the appropriate district court would not serve the interests of justice. It denied Izac's motion for appointment of counsel and transcripts at government expense and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    In Re: Charles Izac V., 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Charles Izac filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging his 2006 sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed the petition, as it ordinarily declines to entertain original habeas petitions under 28 U.S.C. 2241. The court also found that transferring the case to the appropriate district court would not serve the interests of justice. It denied Izac's motion for appointment of counsel and transcripts at government expense and dispensed with oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-08-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-6640

    Original Title

    In Re: Charles Izac v., 4th Cir. (2014)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Charles Izac filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging his 2006 sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed the petition, as it ordinarily declines to entertain original habeas petitions under 28 U.S.C. 2241. The court also found that transferring the case to the appropriate district court would not serve the interests of justice. It denied Izac's motion for appointment of counsel and transcripts at government expense and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    In Re: Charles Izac V., 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Charles Izac filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging his 2006 sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed the petition, as it ordinarily declines to entertain original habeas petitions under 28 U.S.C. 2241. The court also found that transferring the case to the appropriate district court would not serve the interests of justice. It denied Izac's motion for appointment of counsel and transcripts at government expense and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-6640

    In re:

    CHARLES D. IZAC,

    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Extraordinary Writ.


    (3:02-cr-00058-JPB-JSK-1)

    Submitted:

    August 21, 2014

    Decided:

    August 26, 2014

    Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Charles D. Izac, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Charles D. Izac filed a petition for an original writ
    of

    habeas

    corpus,

    challenging

    the

    validity

    of

    his

    sentence

    imposed in May 2006 and arguing that he was denied the effective
    assistance of counsel during the trial and that he is actually
    innocent.

    This

    court

    ordinarily

    declines

    to

    entertain

    an

    original habeas petition filed under 28 U.S.C. 2241 (2012),


    and this case provides no reason to depart from this general
    rule.

    Moreover, we find that the interests of justice would not

    be served by transferring the matter to the appropriate district


    court.

    See 28 U.S.C. 1631 (2012); Fed. R. App. P. 22(a).


    Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed in forma

    pauperis, we dismiss the petition.

    We also deny Izacs motion

    for appointment of counsel and for transcripts at government


    expense.
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    contentions
    this

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.
    PETITION DISMISSED

    You might also like