Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Betty Anderson filed a complaint against multiple South Carolina state agencies and commissions alleging employment discrimination. The district court dismissed the complaint. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal in a per curiam opinion without oral argument, finding the issues had been recently and authoritatively decided. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the dismissal based on the reasoning of the district court's September 23, 1986 order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Betty Anderson filed a complaint against multiple South Carolina state agencies and commissions alleging employment discrimination. The district court dismissed the complaint. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal in a per curiam opinion without oral argument, finding the issues had been recently and authoritatively decided. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the dismissal based on the reasoning of the district court's September 23, 1986 order.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1987-02-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 811 F.2d 1504 Docket: 86-2161

    Original Title

    Betty D. Anderson v. South Carolina Employment Commission Equal Employment Opportunity Commission South Carolina Department of Mental Retardation Office of Civil Rights South Carolina Tax Commission University of South Carolina Richard D. Riley Governor, South Carolina Human Affairs Commission, 811 F.2d 1504, 4th Cir. (1987)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Betty Anderson filed a complaint against multiple South Carolina state agencies and commissions alleging employment discrimination. The district court dismissed the complaint. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal in a per curiam opinion without oral argument, finding the issues had been recently and authoritatively decided. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the dismissal based on the reasoning of the district court's September 23, 1986 order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Betty Anderson filed a complaint against multiple South Carolina state agencies and commissions alleging employment discrimination. The district court dismissed the complaint. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal in a per curiam opinion without oral argument, finding the issues had been recently and authoritatively decided. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the dismissal based on the reasoning of the district court's September 23, 1986 order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    811 F.

    2d 1504
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Betty D. ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    SOUTH CAROLINA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION; Equal
    Employment
    Opportunity Commission; South Carolina Department of
    Mental
    Retardation; Office of Civil Rights; South Carolina Tax
    Commission; University of South Carolina; Richard D.
    Riley; Governor, South Carolina Human Affairs Commission,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 86-2161.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Nov. 28, 1986.
    Decided Feb. 2, 1987.

    Before RUSSELL, WIDENER and HALL, Circuit Judges.


    Betty D. Anderson, appellant pro se.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal
    from that court's order dismissing the complaint is without merit. Because the
    dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with
    oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district
    court. Anderson v. South Carolina Employment Commission, C/A No. 86-1598

    (D.S.C., Sept. 23, 1986).


    2

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like