Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • James v. CP&L/Progress Energy, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Frances A. James, who is African American, sued her former employer CP&L/Progress Energy for employment discrimination based on disability and race. The district court granted summary judgment to the employer, finding no evidence of discrimination. James appealed, but the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning or decision. The appeals court determined that oral arguments were not necessary and affirmed the lower court's judgment.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-05-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-2289

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Frances A. James, who is African American, sued her former employer CP&L/Progress Energy for employment discrimination based on disability and race. The district court granted summary judgment to the employer, finding no evidence of discrimination. James appealed, but the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning or decision. The appeals court determined that oral arguments were not necessary and affirmed the lower court's judgment.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    James v. CP&L/Progress Energy, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Frances A. James, who is African American, sued her former employer CP&L/Progress Energy for employment discrimination based on disability and race. The district court granted summary judgment to the employer, finding no evidence of discrimination. James appealed, but the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning or decision. The appeals court determined that oral arguments were not necessary and affirmed the lower court's judgment.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-2289

    FRANCES A. JAMES,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    CP&L/PROGRESS ENERGY,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Malcolm J. Howard,
    District Judge. (CA-02-920-H)

    Submitted:

    April 27, 2005

    Decided:

    May 12, 2005

    Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Frances A. James, Appellant Pro Se. Zebulon Dyer Anderson, SMITH,


    ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, Raleigh, North
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Frances A. James appeals the district courts order
    granting her former employers motion for summary judgment in her
    civil action in which she alleged employment discrimination based
    upon her disability and race.
    no reversible error.
    the district court.

    We have reviewed the record and find

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of


    See James v. CP&L/Progress Energy, No. CA-02-

    920-H (E.D.N.C. Sept. 10, 2004).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like