Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Travis Marron v. John Jabe, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views4 pages
    Travis Jackson Marron appealed the district court's order denying his motion to compel discovery and granting summary judgment to John Jabe in Marron's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of his religious rights. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also determined that Marron did not properly present his additional claims of freedom of speech, freedom of the press, Establishment Clause, and antitrust in the district court, so they would not review them. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-08-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-6353

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Travis Jackson Marron appealed the district court's order denying his motion to compel discovery and granting summary judgment to John Jabe in Marron's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of his religious rights. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also determined that Marron did not properly present his additional claims of freedom of speech, freedom of the press, Establishment Clause, and antitrust in the district court, so they would not review them. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views4 pages

    Travis Marron v. John Jabe, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Travis Jackson Marron appealed the district court's order denying his motion to compel discovery and granting summary judgment to John Jabe in Marron's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of his religious rights. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also determined that Marron did not properly present his additional claims of freedom of speech, freedom of the press, Establishment Clause, and antitrust in the district court, so they would not review them. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 4

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-6353

    TRAVIS JACKSON MARRON,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    JOHN JABE, Asst. Dir. of Corrections,
    Defendant - Appellee,
    and
    JONES, C.E.O./Founder of J.E.M.,
    Defendant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    T. S. Ellis, III,
    Senior District Judge. (1:12-cv-00468-TSE-TRJ)

    Submitted:

    July 30, 2014


    Amended:

    Decided:

    August 26, 2014

    August 28, 2014

    Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Travis Jackson Marron, Appellant Pro Se.


    Kate Elizabeth
    Dwyre, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond,
    Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Travis
    order

    Jackson

    denying

    his

    Marron
    motion

    summary

    judgment

    to

    U.S.C.

    (2012)

    1983

    John

    to

    appeals
    compel

    Jabe *
    and

    in

    the

    the

    district

    discovery

    Marrons
    Religious

    and

    courts
    granting

    action under
    Land

    Use

    42
    and

    Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. 2000cc to 2000cc-5


    (2012).
    Marron did not appeal that part of the district courts
    order granting summary judgment on his Equal Protection claim.
    We therefore do not review the district courts disposition of
    that claim.

    See 4th Cir. R. 34(b) (limit[ing] review to the

    issues raised in the informal brief).


    Marron argues that the district court erred in failing to
    hold Jabe in default.

    He also contends that the court erred in

    not considering his freedom of speech, freedom of the press,


    Establishment Clause, and antitrust claims.

    As to the antitrust

    claim, we note that the district court dismissed with prejudice


    Marrons

    vague

    claim

    unlawful monopoly.

    in

    his

    original

    complaint

    based

    on

    We find no error in that judgment.

    an
    And

    because Marron did not properly present the other claims in the
    district court, we will not review them now on appeal.

    Muth v.

    United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993).


    *

    The district court dismissed a second defendant early on


    in the proceeding below, and Marron does not challenge this
    disposition on appeal.
    3

    With respect to Marrons remaining contentions, we


    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    have
    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Marron v. Jabe, No. 1:12-cv-00468-TSE-TRJ (E.D. Va. Feb.

    14, 2014).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    contentions
    this

    are

    court

    adequately
    and

    presented

    argument

    would

    in

    the
    not

    materials
    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like