Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 0 views

    Butts v. Stubblefield, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Wayne Douglas Butts filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). Butts appealed the district court's denial. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found Butts' appeal to be frivolous. The Court dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying Butts' § 1983 complaint. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent in the Fourth Circuit.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Butts v. Stubblefield, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    Wayne Douglas Butts filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). Butts appealed the district court's denial. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found Butts' appeal to be frivolous. The Court dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying Butts' § 1983 complaint. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent in the Fourth Circuit.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-05-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-7819

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Wayne Douglas Butts filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). Butts appealed the district court's denial. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found Butts' appeal to be frivolous. The Court dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying Butts' § 1983 complaint. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent in the Fourth Circuit.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views2 pages

    Butts v. Stubblefield, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Wayne Douglas Butts filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). Butts appealed the district court's denial. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found Butts' appeal to be frivolous. The Court dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying Butts' § 1983 complaint. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent in the Fourth Circuit.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-7819

    WAYNE DOUGLAS BUTTS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MR. STUBBLEFIELD, Master Jail Officer; MR.
    CHASE, Sgt./Supervisor Laundry; MR. REEVES,
    Sgt./Housing
    Unit
    Manager;
    MR.
    FOX,
    Sgt./Hearings Officer; D. L. SIMONS, Asst.
    Superintendent,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
    Judge. (CA-02-873)

    Submitted:

    April 17, 2003

    Decided:

    May 28, 2003

    Before KING and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Wayne Douglas Butts, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Wayne Douglas Butts appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint under 28
    U.S.C. 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that
    this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the
    reasoning of the district court.

    See Butts v. Stubblefield, No.

    CA-02-873 (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 18, 2002, entered Nov. 19, 2002). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like