Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Calvin Clark v. John Owens, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    Calvin Lavan Clark, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 petition. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's decision to deny Clark's petition for the reasons stated in Clark v. Owens, No. 1:11-cv-00006-SB (D.S.C. Mar. 10, 2011). The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-08-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-6394

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Calvin Lavan Clark, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 petition. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's decision to deny Clark's petition for the reasons stated in Clark v. Owens, No. 1:11-cv-00006-SB (D.S.C. Mar. 10, 2011). The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views2 pages

    Calvin Clark v. John Owens, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Calvin Lavan Clark, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 petition. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's decision to deny Clark's petition for the reasons stated in Clark v. Owens, No. 1:11-cv-00006-SB (D.S.C. Mar. 10, 2011). The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-6394

    CALVIN LAVAN CLARK,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    JOHN R. OWENS, Warden, FCI WILLIAMSBURG,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Aiken.
    Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District
    Judge. (1:11-cv-00006-SB)

    Submitted:

    July 26, 2011

    Decided:

    August 5, 2011

    Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Calvin Lavan Clark, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Calvin Lavan Clark, a federal prisoner, appeals the
    district

    courts

    order

    accepting

    the

    recommendation

    of

    the

    magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. 2241


    (West 2006 & Supp. 2011) petition.
    and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record

    Accordingly, we affirm for the

    reasons stated by the district court.


    cv-00006-SB

    (D.S.C.

    Mar. 10,

    2011).

    Clark v. Owens, No. 1:11We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like