Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Walter Green v. B.S. Morton R.F. Wilson D. Garraghty, 865 F.2d 1258, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a pro se plaintiff, Walter Green, who appealed a district court's denial of relief under either 42 U.S.C. § 1983 or 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit. The court also dispensed with oral argument as the dispositive issues had been recently decided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1989-01-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 865 F.2d 1258 Docket: 88-6811

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a pro se plaintiff, Walter Green, who appealed a district court's denial of relief under either 42 U.S.C. § 1983 or 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit. The court also dispensed with oral argument as the dispositive issues had been recently decided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Walter Green v. B.S. Morton R.F. Wilson D. Garraghty, 865 F.2d 1258, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a pro se plaintiff, Walter Green, who appealed a district court's denial of relief under either 42 U.S.C. § 1983 or 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit. The court also dispensed with oral argument as the dispositive issues had been recently decided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    865 F.

    2d 1258
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Walter GREEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    B.S. MORTON; R.F. Wilson; D. Garraghty, DefendantsAppellees.
    No. 88-6811.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: Dec. 9, 1988.
    Decided: Jan. 10, 1989.

    Walter Green, appellant pro se.


    Eric Karl Gould Fiske (Office of the Attorney General), for appellees.
    Before DONALD RUSSELL and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges, and
    BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Walter Green appeals from the district court's order denying him relief under
    either 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 or 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254.* Our review of the record
    and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Green v. Morton,
    C/A No. 88-452-N (E.D.Va. Sept. 20, 1988). We dispense with oral argument
    because the dispositive issues have recently been decided authoritatively.

    AFFIRMED.

    The defendants below were granted summary judgment on Green's complaint


    insofar as it could be construed under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. As an action
    attacking duration of confinement pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254, the suit was
    dismissed without prejudice for failing to exhaust state remedies

    You might also like