Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Heggen, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Bruce Heggen appealed a district court's denial of his motion for return of seized property without prejudice. A panel of the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The panel dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The unpublished opinion does not serve as binding precedent.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-11-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-7253

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Bruce Heggen appealed a district court's denial of his motion for return of seized property without prejudice. A panel of the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The panel dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The unpublished opinion does not serve as binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Heggen, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Bruce Heggen appealed a district court's denial of his motion for return of seized property without prejudice. A panel of the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The panel dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The unpublished opinion does not serve as binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-7253

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    BRUCE CHARLES HEGGEN,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
    District Judge. (CR-01-46)

    Submitted:

    November 6, 2003

    Decided:

    November 20, 2003

    Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Bruce Charles Heggen, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer Marie Hoefling,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Bruce

    Charles

    Heggen

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying without prejudice his motion for return of seized property.


    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court. See United States v. Heggen, No. CR-01-46 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 6,
    2003).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like