Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 17 views

    Mangum v. Huffman, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Beverly Ricardo Mangum, a prisoner, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against numerous prison officials alleging violations of his civil rights. The district court denied relief and Mangum's subsequent motion to alter or amend the judgment. The Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no abuse of discretion or reversible error in the district court's rulings. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and concluded the rulings should stand.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Mangum v. Huffman, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    17 views2 pages
    Beverly Ricardo Mangum, a prisoner, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against numerous prison officials alleging violations of his civil rights. The district court denied relief and Mangum's subsequent motion to alter or amend the judgment. The Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no abuse of discretion or reversible error in the district court's rulings. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and concluded the rulings should stand.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-04-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-7542

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Beverly Ricardo Mangum, a prisoner, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against numerous prison officials alleging violations of his civil rights. The district court denied relief and Mangum's subsequent motion to alter or amend the judgment. The Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no abuse of discretion or reversible error in the district court's rulings. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and concluded the rulings should stand.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    17 views2 pages

    Mangum v. Huffman, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Beverly Ricardo Mangum, a prisoner, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against numerous prison officials alleging violations of his civil rights. The district court denied relief and Mangum's subsequent motion to alter or amend the judgment. The Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no abuse of discretion or reversible error in the district court's rulings. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and concluded the rulings should stand.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-7542

    BEVERLY RICARDO MANGUM,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    L. W. HUFFMAN; J. B. TAYLOR; D. C. STEWART; A.
    L. CRAWFORD; SERGEANT BERRY; H. BOOTH-BROWN;
    C/O CARTER, JR.; G. DEDRICK; LYNN COX; G. P.
    HACTON; LIEUTENANT JONES; M. W. MURPHY; P. N.
    KNIGHT, Captain; S. W. HOLLOR; T. S. MILLER;
    F. S. ROBINSON; T. STEWART; C/O PROCTOR; L.
    SHEFFER; ASSISTANT WARDEN JARVIS; S. FARRISH;
    C/O KEY; C/O HAROLD; SERGEANT HENRY; L.
    PAINTER; CAPTAIN SPITLER; R.R. HOLLOWAY; C/O
    EUTSLER; P. JOHNSON; C/O WALTERS; R. DAWSON;
    J. LEE; L. M. SAUNDERS; P. MASSIE; C/O SPEARS;
    R. L. FRADY; J. H. LYLE, Lieutenant; C/O
    FLETCHER; C/O GARRETT; SERGEANT SLIVER;
    SERGEANT TAYLOR; D. SWISHER; R. BOYER,
    Defendants - Appellees,
    and
    SERGEANT HENNY; D. N. FOLEY; C/O ALLEN;
    SERGEANT HARRIS; K. BAILEY; UNKNOWN MEMBERS OF
    THE APPEALS UNIT,
    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge.
    (CA-94-403-R)

    Submitted:

    April 15, 1996

    Decided:

    April 23, 1996

    Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit
    Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Beverly Ricardo Mangum, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent,
    Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint and Fed. R. Civ. P.
    59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment. We have reviewed the
    record and the district court's opinion and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Mangum v. Huffman, No. CA-94-403-R
    (W.D. Va. Sept. 5 & 15, 1995). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED
    2

    You might also like