Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    Murray v. US Postal Service, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Tyrone Murray's complaint against the United States Postal Service as frivolous. The district court had dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e), which allows dismissal of in forma pauperis complaints that are frivolous. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissal. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Murray v. US Postal Service, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Tyrone Murray's complaint against the United States Postal Service as frivolous. The district court had dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e), which allows dismissal of in forma pauperis complaints that are frivolous. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissal. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-07-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-1548

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Tyrone Murray's complaint against the United States Postal Service as frivolous. The district court had dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e), which allows dismissal of in forma pauperis complaints that are frivolous. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissal. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Murray v. US Postal Service, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Tyrone Murray's complaint against the United States Postal Service as frivolous. The district court had dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e), which allows dismissal of in forma pauperis complaints that are frivolous. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissal. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-1548

    TYRONE E. MURRAY, SR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-98445-L)

    Submitted:

    June 18, 1998

    Decided:

    July 8, 1998

    Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Tyrone E. Murray, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Tyrone E. Murray, Sr., appeals the district courts order
    dismissing his complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C.A. 1915(e)
    (West Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district
    courts opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
    affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Murray v. United
    States Postal Serv., No. CA-98-445-L (D. Md. Apr. 1, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like