Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 0 views

    United States v. Lozano, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Reinaldo Lozano's motions filed under Rule 35(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and for reconsideration. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court also declined to consider any new issues Lozano attempted to raise for the first time on appeal. The ruling affirms the lower court's decision on the basis of its reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Lozano, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    The document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Reinaldo Lozano's motions filed under Rule 35(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and for reconsideration. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court also declined to consider any new issues Lozano attempted to raise for the first time on appeal. The ruling affirms the lower court's decision on the basis of its reasoning.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-07-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-6666

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Reinaldo Lozano's motions filed under Rule 35(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and for reconsideration. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court also declined to consider any new issues Lozano attempted to raise for the first time on appeal. The ruling affirms the lower court's decision on the basis of its reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views2 pages

    United States v. Lozano, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Reinaldo Lozano's motions filed under Rule 35(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and for reconsideration. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court also declined to consider any new issues Lozano attempted to raise for the first time on appeal. The ruling affirms the lower court's decision on the basis of its reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 97-6666

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    REINALDO LOZANO, a/k/a Ray,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CR-86-35)
    Submitted:

    July 10, 1997

    Decided:

    July 24, 1997

    Before RUSSELL, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Reinaldo Lozano, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham, II,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying his motions filed under Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a), and for reconsideration.
    We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
    find no reversible error. We decline to review any issues Appellant
    seeks to raise for the first time on appeal. Accordingly, we affirm
    on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Lozano,
    No. CR-86-35 (E.D. Va. Apr. 14, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like