Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    McLee v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Henderson McLee's appeal of a district court's denial of relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that McLee was not entitled to relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    McLee v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Henderson McLee's appeal of a district court's denial of relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that McLee was not entitled to relief.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-03-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-6935

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Henderson McLee's appeal of a district court's denial of relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that McLee was not entitled to relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    McLee v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Henderson McLee's appeal of a district court's denial of relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that McLee was not entitled to relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-6935

    HENDERSON MCLEE,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia
    Department of Corrections,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CA-96-1152-2)
    Submitted:

    March 12, 1998

    Decided:

    March 23, 1998

    Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.


    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    William P. Robinson, Jr., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Wirt
    Peebles Marks, IV, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA,
    Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West 1994 &
    Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
    find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
    court. McLee v. Angelone, No. CA-96-1152-2 (E.D. Va. June 11,
    1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like