Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Curtis Young, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Curtis Allen Young's motion to reduce his sentence. The appeals court held that Young was ineligible for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) as the district court had determined. It also found that amendments 599 and 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines, which Young also cited, did not provide any basis for a reduced sentence in his case.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-02-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-7674

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Curtis Allen Young's motion to reduce his sentence. The appeals court held that Young was ineligible for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) as the district court had determined. It also found that amendments 599 and 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines, which Young also cited, did not provide any basis for a reduced sentence in his case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Curtis Young, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Curtis Allen Young's motion to reduce his sentence. The appeals court held that Young was ineligible for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) as the district court had determined. It also found that amendments 599 and 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines, which Young also cited, did not provide any basis for a reduced sentence in his case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-7674

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    CURTIS ALLEN YOUNG,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda Wright Allen, District
    Judge. (2:01-cr-00227-AWA-1)

    Submitted:

    February 26, 2013

    Decided:

    February 28, 2013

    Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Curtis Allen Young, Appellant Pro Se.


    Timothy Richard Murphy,
    Special
    Assistant
    United
    States
    Attorney,
    Newport
    News,
    Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Curtis Allen Young appeals the district courts order
    denying his motion seeking a reduction of his sentence under 18
    U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006).

    We court review the denial of a

    3582(c)(2) motion for abuse of discretion.


    Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 186 (4th Cir. 2010).

    United States v.

    We have reviewed the

    record and conclude that, as the district court held, Young is


    ineligible for the reduction he seeks.
    extent

    Young

    also

    seeks

    reduction

    Id. at 187.
    of

    his

    To the

    sentence

    under

    Amendments 599 and 750 of the Sentencing Guidelines, neither


    amendment is assists him.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like