Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    United States v. Dodson, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to reduce Carroll Dodson's sentence from 524 months to 456 months of imprisonment pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Dodson, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to reduce Carroll Dodson's sentence from 524 months to 456 months of imprisonment pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-06-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-6541

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to reduce Carroll Dodson's sentence from 524 months to 456 months of imprisonment pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Dodson, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to reduce Carroll Dodson's sentence from 524 months to 456 months of imprisonment pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-6541

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    CARROLL EUGENE DODSON,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
    District Judge. (7:94-cr-40106-jlk-1)

    Submitted:

    June 19, 2008

    Decided:

    June 25, 2008

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Carroll Eugene Dodson, Appellant Pro Se. Ray Burton Fitzgerald,


    Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville,
    Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Carroll Eugene Dodson appeals the district courts order
    reducing his sentence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2000),
    from 524 to 456 months of imprisonment.

    We have reviewed the

    record and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the

    court.

    reasons

    stated

    by

    the

    district

    See

    United

    States

    v. Dodson, No. 7:94-cr-40106-jlk-1 (W.D. Va. Apr. 2, 2008).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like