Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Jerome H. Hettleman v. Englehard Minerals and Chemicals Corporation, A Delaware Corporation, 512 F.2d 674, 4th Cir. (1975)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views1 page
    The document summarizes a court case where plaintiffs sued defendant Englehard Minerals and Chemicals Corporation for breach of a covenant to repair leasehold premises. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling in favor of the plaintiffs, finding that the district court correctly applied Maryland law and its factual findings were not clearly erroneous. The court provided no further details about the specific claims or facts of the case.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1975-04-02 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 512 F.2d 674 Docket: 74-1813

    Original Title

    Jerome H. Hettleman v. Englehard Minerals and Chemicals Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, 512 F.2d 674, 4th Cir. (1975)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document summarizes a court case where plaintiffs sued defendant Englehard Minerals and Chemicals Corporation for breach of a covenant to repair leasehold premises. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling in favor of the plaintiffs, finding that the district court correctly applied Maryland law and its factual findings were not clearly erroneous. The court provided no further details about the specific claims or facts of the case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views1 page

    Jerome H. Hettleman v. Englehard Minerals and Chemicals Corporation, A Delaware Corporation, 512 F.2d 674, 4th Cir. (1975)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document summarizes a court case where plaintiffs sued defendant Englehard Minerals and Chemicals Corporation for breach of a covenant to repair leasehold premises. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling in favor of the plaintiffs, finding that the district court correctly applied Maryland law and its factual findings were not clearly erroneous. The court provided no further details about the specific claims or facts of the case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    512 F.

    2d 674

    Jerome H. HETTLEMAN et al., Appellees,


    v.
    ENGLEHARD MINERALS and CHEMICALS
    CORPORATION, a Delaware
    Corporation, Appellant.
    No. 74-1813.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Argued March 6, 1975.
    Decided April 2, 1975.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
    at Baltimore; Edward S. Northrop, Chief Judge.
    Melvin D. Kraft, New York City, P.C. (David L. Bowers and Benjamin C.
    Howard, Baltimore, Md., on brief) for appellant.
    Stephen H. Sachs, Baltimore, Md. (John J. Kenny, Baltimore, Md., on
    brief) for appellees.
    Before FIELD and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and HALL, District Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    This action for damages for the alleged breach of a covenant to repair leasehold
    premises was tried to the court which rendered judgment in favor of the
    plaintiffs. Upon consideration of the record, briefs and oral arguments, we are
    persuaded that the district court correctly applied the principles of Maryland
    law and that its factual findings were not clearly erroneous. Rule 52(a),
    Fed.R.Civ.P.

    Affirmed.

    You might also like