Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    Jones v. Guillory, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Benjamin Jones. The district court had dismissed Jones' complaint without prejudice for failing to amend or provide particular details. The appeals court found that because the complaint could potentially be saved by amendment, the dismissal order was not final. As such, the appeals court did not have jurisdiction to consider the interlocutory appeal and dismissed the case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Jones v. Guillory, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Benjamin Jones. The district court had dismissed Jones' complaint without prejudice for failing to amend or provide particular details. The appeals court found that because the complaint could potentially be saved by amendment, the dismissal order was not final. As such, the appeals court did not have jurisdiction to consider the interlocutory appeal and dismissed the case.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-01-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-7641

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Benjamin Jones. The district court had dismissed Jones' complaint without prejudice for failing to amend or provide particular details. The appeals court found that because the complaint could potentially be saved by amendment, the dismissal order was not final. As such, the appeals court did not have jurisdiction to consider the interlocutory appeal and dismissed the case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Jones v. Guillory, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Benjamin Jones. The district court had dismissed Jones' complaint without prejudice for failing to amend or provide particular details. The appeals court found that because the complaint could potentially be saved by amendment, the dismissal order was not final. As such, the appeals court did not have jurisdiction to consider the interlocutory appeal and dismissed the case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-7641

    BENJAMIN HENDERSON JONES,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    D. R. GUILLORY; JARVIS; MOORE; KELLY; LAYTON
    T. LESTER; CARRAGELA; TOWNSEND; HENRY DIXON,
    Sgt.; RONALD W. ANGELONE; J. GILMORE; GEORGE
    ALLEN,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-95-711-AM)
    Submitted:

    January 11, 1996

    Decided:

    January 25, 1996

    Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.


    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Benjamin Henderson Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Benjamin Jones appeals from a district court order dismissing
    his complaint without prejudice for failure to amend or particularize. We dismiss.
    Because the complaint may be saved by amendment, the appeal of
    the order dismissing it is interlocutory and we are without jurisdiction to consider it. Domino Sugar Corp v. Sugar Workers Local
    Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1067 (4th Cir. 1993). Therefore, we
    dismiss the appeal.
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like