Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Thomas v. Beshears, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Ton Julius Thomas filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. Thomas appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and district court opinion and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-03-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-7598

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ton Julius Thomas filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. Thomas appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and district court opinion and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Thomas v. Beshears, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ton Julius Thomas filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. Thomas appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and district court opinion and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-7598

    TON JULIUS THOMAS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    EARL BESHEARS, Warden; EASTERN CORRECTIONAL
    INSTITUTION; GEORGIA PERDUE, R.N.; RAZAAK
    ENIOLA, Dr.; DALE KERSHOW, Officer,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.
    (CA-97-406-JFM)
    Submitted:

    February 26, 1998

    Decided:

    March 19, 1998

    Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Ton Julius Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
    OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Joseph Barry Chazen, Gina Marie
    Smith, MEYERS, BILLINGSLEY, RODBELL & ROSENBAUM, P.A., Riverdale,
    Maryland, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Thomas v. Beshears, No. CA-97-406-JFM (D. Md. Oct. 1, 1997).
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like