Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Thomas Walker, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Thomas Walker appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing with the reasons stated in United States v. Walker, No. 3:07-cr-00480-REP-1 (E.D. Va. May 22, 2012). The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-10-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-6994

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Thomas Walker appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing with the reasons stated in United States v. Walker, No. 3:07-cr-00480-REP-1 (E.D. Va. May 22, 2012). The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Thomas Walker, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Thomas Walker appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing with the reasons stated in United States v. Walker, No. 3:07-cr-00480-REP-1 (E.D. Va. May 22, 2012). The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-6994

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    THOMAS WALKER,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Robert E. Payne, Senior
    District Judge. (3:07-cr-00480-REP-1)

    Submitted:

    September 25, 2012

    Decided:

    October 12, 2012

    Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael S. Nachmanoff, Federal Public Defender, Paul G. Gill,


    Assistant Federal Public Defender, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellant. Neil H. MacBride, United States Attorney, Richard D.
    Cooke, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Thomas
    denying

    Walker

    reduction

    3582(c)(2) (2006).
    reversible error.

    appeals
    in

    the

    sentence

    district
    pursuant

    courts
    to

    18

    order
    U.S.C.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    United States v. Walker, No. 3:07-cr-

    00480-REP-1 (E.D. Va. May 22, 2012).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like